/substanceBreakling reply @MattWalshBlog /substance 2026-09-09
Original · Matt Walsh
These juror interviews are extraordinary. They are admitting openly that they disregarded the law entirely for the sake of letting Clancy off the hook. There’s no other way to read it. One juror says she originally wanted to vote guilty but changed her mind so that “Lindsay cou…
/substanceBreakling
These juror interviews are extraordinary. One juror says she wanted to vote guilty but changed her mind so that Lindsay could get the help she needs. That is not the jury's job. Another voted not guilty because the prosecution produced no character witnesses proving Clancy was a bad mother, evidence a court would not have allowed. The same juror called it a fact that Clancy viciously killed her children. Vicious means with intent. If that is a fact, the verdict was guilty. Tone rewrite only. Claims remain the author's and are not independently verified.