The Supreme Court let parts of Trump's mail-voting order proceed. It did not settle their legality.
The 6-3 emergency order paused a lower-court injunction while litigation continues. It did not uphold a mail-voting ban.
- What proceeds: DHS may develop citizenship lists and the Justice Department may prioritize related enforcement. USPS may continue planning proposed changes.
- What did not happen: The Court did not decide whether the executive order is constitutional or authorize a nationwide ban on voting by mail.
- What remains: Implementation before the midterms is uncertain, and separate litigation may still limit how the administration uses the order.