/ground/groundMaps what a thread appears to be arguing about — the sides and the open questions — without declaring a winner.Tech & AICitrini's AI designed scorpion antivenom: real advance or early hype
Source thread ↗Why grounded?
Replies cycled through the same objection and personal jabs.
Grounded
Citrini says it used Anthropic's internal research model to design an experimental scorpion antivenom. Replies argue whether a binding result justifies the cost.
Sides
- Binding only: The design binds the toxin but has not been shown to neutralize it, so it is an early result.
- Costly compute: 10,000 H100 hours is a lot for a binding result that a funded postdoc could reach.
- Faster design: Preclinical design is far faster than five years ago and is now 40 to 100 times cheaper than when this began.
- Trials bottleneck: Fast design moves the bottleneck to lab validation and human trials, which still cost millions.